There’s an “unintended Napster effect” taking place today in the world of digital publishing. With the advent of the iPad and other digital devices, software solutions enabling Web 2.0 “presto publishing,” and the proliferation of social networking sites like Facebook, where everyone shares everything, unintended use of rights-protected images is running rampant.
Case in point: the State of Texas is facing a lawsuit over what seems to be an issue of vectoring a previously published image of a cowboy for the State’s 4-5 million annual car inspection stickers. It appears State inmates responsible for the program used an image originally published in the Texas Parks and Wildlife magazine from 1998 to create an outline of the cowboy for the inspection sticker. You may ask, “How were they to know?” At PicScout, we ask, “Why shouldn’t they (or at least their supervisors) know?”, as the issue of preventing plagiarism, especially in “copying” others’ words, dates back to early in one’s education. But the progression of plagiarism to images seems to have been lost on many.
That’s why there are a series of educational programs underway from Copyright Alliance, Getty Images, Stock Photo Rights, and PACA (Picture Archive Council of America, the industry trade association), which offer schools information for students about the proper use of images in today’s digital world. The reality is technology has made it too easy to simply do the wrong thing, yet technology can also make it very easy to do the right thing.
Internet and platform giants like Google, Yahoo, Bing, Apple and other content display vendors have the power today to easily implement user experiences that support content creators and licensing outlets like stock agencies, improve user experiences, and drive results to their own bottom-lines. By simply adding the credit to the content and inserting three words –“license (or buy) image now” – as an option when an image appears, the search giants will have done what once happened and nearly doubled sales in the shampoo industry: the addition of the word “repeat” on shampoo bottle instructions.
This approach is valuable to content creators because it provides a means to monetize their assets, and it encourages the ongoing development and creation of new works.
There will always be individuals with more time than money that will do the wrong thing, and individuals with more money than time that will do the right thing, if it is easy for the transaction to occur. Clearly identifying licensable images improves user experience by making it simple for people to instantly ID images and to pay for their use. This image identification also harnesses the power of search, providing a far broader selection of images. It even enables crowdsourcing and user-generated content to find a means of gaining legitimacy through a monetizing activity that supports the content creator’s right to sell his or her work. Add in Creative Commons to the licensing mix, and you’ve also provided a means by which users can legitimately use content for free under certain conditions.
ImageExchange unveiled a new user experience this week that points to the simplicity of Instant Image ID for content users, and assures content creators that Every Image Gets Its Credit. ImageExchange plays on top of search engines image results, and while this is a winning ticket for all involved, the real trifecta occurs when all three search engines recognize the power of their image search results pages and implement monetization opportunities that benefit themselves, content creators and content users.


